Professional Intervention: Local Opinion Leaders
Definition: Use of providers nominated by their colleagues as ‘educationally influential’. The investigators must have explicitly stated that their colleagues identified the opinion leaders.)
Effectiveness: One high quality review (Thomas) and one key review (Doumit) were identified. One key review (Doumit) found the use of local opinion leaders alone or combined with other interventions to be generally effective for improving appropriate care outcomes. One high quality review (Thomas) had an insufficient number of studies to draw any conclusions about the effectiveness of the intervention on appropriate care outcomes.
Summary of Overall Findings from Reviews: 1/1 high quality/key reviews with a sufficient number of studies to draw conclusions found this intervention to be generally effective.
Summary of Findings Related to Prescribing: No high quality or key reviews were identified.
| Reviews Addressing This Intervention |
Quality Assessment Tool: AMSTAR Score (of 11 points) |
|
Thomas L, Cullum N, McColl E, Rousseau N, Soutter J, Steen N.
Guidelines in professions allied to medicine.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2000 (1):CD000349.
|
8 (High) |
|
Doumit G, Gattelari M, Grimshaw J, O'Brien MA.
Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2006 (1):CD000125.
|
7 (Medium) |
|
van der Wees PJ, Jamtvedt G, Rebbeck T, de Bie RA, Dekker J, Hendriks EJ.
Multifaceted strategies may increase implementation of physiotherapy clinical guidelines: a systematic review.
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy
2008 54 (4):233-241.
|
7 (Medium) |
|
Chaillet N, Dubé E, Dugas M, Audibert F, Tourigny C, Fraser WD, Dumont A.
Evidence-based strategies for implementing guidelines in obstetrics: a systematic review.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
2006 108 (5):1234-1245.
|
4 (Medium) |